Too Many Coincidences

Sandy Hook Massacre:  WHY?

THEORY #1.  GUN CONTROL

The most prevalent theory out there is this massacre was 'created' as a propaganda piece to promote the need for stronger gun control. There are a lot of inconsistencies from the beginning until now and the most shocking element of all the coverage is that the victims "parents", seen in interviews were paid actors.  When a person is in deep mourning, they cry and cry and their eyes get red and swollen and stay that way for days.  Even if they manage to compose themselves long enough to handle meetings and interviews, their eyes tell the story of their grief.  The parents interviewed in many of the news clips look just fine.  Curious.




THEORY #2. COVER-UP OF MASSIVE BANK FRAUD

It all begins with  interest fees charged by banks in London. Judge Napolitano explains it better than I can.

More Information:  Sixteen Banks Hit with Libor Subpoenaes

Chances are we will be hearing more about this, but then again, considering how intimidated and corrupt the media is, chances are we will NOT be hearing about this.  What's really interesting about this story is how it ties in with the recent shootings and mass murders in Aurora, Colorado and most recently, in Sandy Hook, CT.  The fathers of both shooters in these incidents are rumored to be testifying on the International LIBOR scandal.  In both stories, the media reports there was only one shooter, but in both instances there are interviews with actual witnesses that say each had one or more accomplices.  Gary Lippert produced a video of interviews with these witnesses.  In addition, he provides actual police radio recordings of the incident in Connecticut.

 

An Attempted Interview with the father of Adam Lanza (click for source)

While the world watched news of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary unfold, it seems Peter Lanza only found out about his connection to the tragic events several hours later. Moments after police left Peter Lanza’s home in Stamford, Conn., around 40 miles from Newtown, Conn., where the shooting took place, Adam Lanza's father drove up in a blue Mini Cooper. The Stamford Advocate’s Maggie Gordon was waiting outside and when she introduced herself as a reporter she was immediately surprised he didn’t seem to realize why a reporter would want to talk to him.

“So I continued, explaining that I'd been told someone at his address had been linked to the shootings in Newtown,” writes Gordon. “His expression twisted from patient, to surprise to horror; it was obvious that this moment, shortly after 1:30 p.m. Friday, was the first time he had considered his family could have been involved.” Peter Lanza quickly declined to comment and went into his house. Peter and Nancy Lanza divorced in 2009 after 28 years of marriage due to “irreconcilable differences,” according to court records. Adam Lanza was 17 at the time.
Peter Lanza, was the tax director for General Electric, a corporation that paid -0- taxes on 14.2 billion dollars in profits last year and rumored to testify in the LIBOR scandal.

The Father Of James Holmes (click for source)

Robert M. Holmes, the father of James Holmes, is another one of the people rumored to testify in the LIBOR scandal.  The senior Holmes has a PhD in statistics from Cal-Berkeley, a Master's in bio-statistics from UCLA and a bachelor's in mathematics from Stanford.  Over the last ten years, he has developed predictive models for financial services and credit and fraud risk models.  He is one of several scientists who patented a predictive model system used to detect telecommunications fraud.

Read More about Robert M. Holmes and the part he plays in revealing LIBOR and how there may have been an attempted blackmail to keep him from exposing it.

Secretary Timothy Geithner(click for source)

'Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, along with Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL), are turning up the heat on Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner about what he knew and when he knew about the LIBOR manipulation scandal. The Senators also say that in the wake of the scandal, the creation of a new American-based interest rate index is a better alternative and they are requesting a meeting with key Treasury staff on first steps towards that goal'.

On the letter Senators Grassley and Kirk sent Treasury Secretary Geithner demanding an explanation on his “complacency” surrounding LIBOR rates

'In a letter sent today, obtained exclusively by the FOX Business Network, the Senators are demanding a full explanation of what they call the Treasury Secretary’s complacency after finding out the LIBOR rates were flawed. In the letter, Geithner is accused of doing nothing to ‘diminish use of this flawed index in U.S. financial markets’ and, on the contrary, it says the Treasury’s use of LIBOR increased. The Senators say the inaction by Geithner contributed to litigation that is emerging on a state and local level that ‘threatens to clog our courts with multi-billion dollar class action lawsuits’ that the manipulated rates had on the debt burden of state, municipal and local governments.

'The letter references legal observers calling this new litigation boom as ‘the New Asbestos’ of lawsuit cases. The legislators also questioned Geithner’s lack of communication with Congress and the American public during the LIBOR manipulation scandal when it was discussed with the Bank of England in 2007 and 2008. Geithner at the time was head of the New York Federal Reserve and has said the concerns over the LIBOR rate were brought to the attention of the British central bankers, and he felt it was going to 'be on them to take the responsibility for fixing this''.

How Do These All Tie Together?

Obviously, the media has access to the same information as I have presented here; information that has either come from mainstream sources like Reuters or just local news reports such as those used by Gary Lippert (above).  Yet they are not reporting it.  They seem more intent on covering Gun Control, than they are about getting at the truth of this horrific scandal.  It defies the odds that two very important witnesses in bringing to light massive fraud within the most powerful banks in the world, both end up with their sons involved in killing sprees within a few months of each other.   The media unanimously reports that these sons were both the lone killers in each case, but eye-witness accounts are ignored and completely eliminated from public view. In the case of James Holmes, there was at least one accomplice who is said to have gone to the door and let James Holmes in.  In the case of Adam Lanza, not only did a child recount that he saw the police arresting a man outside in the early stages, but the police radio described two additional individuals "coming at them".  Combine this with the ridiculous stories various reporters have been coming up with that have since proven to be flat out lies.  Such as how Adam was supposedly buzzed in to the school, except later when the police were reporting over their radios, they said the glass had been broken on the front door.  One story says Adam was bi polar, another says he has Aspergers.  There are just too many inconsistencies and lies.  

What emerges from basic deduction is that these two incidents seem to have been some sort of intimidation or retribution for some damaging testimony from their two fathers.  But by whom?  Was it the banks? Or perhaps people within our own government who stand to lose untold amounts of money should the details of LIBOR come to light. UBS alone will pay $1.5bn in penalties for routinely manipulating benchmark interest rates over a six-year period to benefit its own trades, paying bribes to interdealer brokers and colluding with other banks.  Barclays paid a similar fine of about one third in it's first settlement back in June.  They were also trying to manipulate Japan's Yen.

Is it much of a stretch to believe that there may have been some really ticked off people out there?  

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

 Who received all that money from the fines? Money that could reach into the trillions. . .

 This is where Timothy Geithner and a number of other high ranking officials in the Obama Administration come into play.  What was their role in all this?  

Were they merely just oblivious and incompetent or are they complicit?  

To what lengths would these Chicago thug types currently running our country go to protect such a Golden Goose?  

Would they sanction murder of innocents?  Especially if they could use such a thing as a basis to once again call for the repeal of the our gun rights as China is demanding! 

What does China, the largest holder of American debt, have to do with all this?
Check out the old Charles Bronson movie "Telefon". . .